Why I Don't Like Superman

The title of this could have also been named why i find Superman boring but this still gets my point across so i'll stick with it. Superman is almost universal love or at least in America. In fact Superman is more American in our eyes than Captain America.That's right i said it Superman is more American Than Captain America


He represents the ultimate good. He has the world in the palm of his hand. There is nothing unattainable for Superman in fact the only limit that Superman has is the limits he puts on Himself. Limits that he can take off whenever he wants yet he doesn't. If he were to do so who knows want would happen. He is paragon of good and yet... I can't stand him. My dislike of Superman is for many reasons but i will try to keep it short.

1) He is a god among men. Even in a world with other super heroes Supes stand out among them but not in any satisfying way. He's not really any different than his contemporary he just way better at his craft then them. While other are strong he is simply stronger others can endure he is invincible he's not really different just better than the rest. He is a tank in a world of bulldozers. Simply put he is a god and like gods he is not relatable in anyway. Sure we can never truly relate to superheroes 100% but we when the costume comes off we can relate to a lot of them. I still have both my parents and I'm not rich but i can relate to Batman pushing away people. I can't relate to Superman aka the boyscout I'm not infallible Superman however is which brings me to the other point

2) He is never wrong. Superman is never wrong. No matter how much you feel like he is wrong be certain he is not. Why you may ask because he is Superman. That is how DC treats Superman. Sure there might be a moral to the story at the end but trust me the moral is that you should listen to Superman. He never fails and because of this he has never had to grow like other characters. He doesn't learn any lessons at the end because there is nothing for him to learn because he is perfect which brings me to my final point

3) He Has no equals. Besides of course monster create specifically to kill him he doesn't have any equals. Superman chooses to live with us mere mortals. Even in the Justice League he has no real equal he so much better than everyone there it isn't funny. Superman is an shinning image of the perfect human and he isn't even human. That's what bothers me. His small "real" American roots don't take away from the fact that every little thing do Superman does seems just a bit condescending when you think about it. It feels forced. In fact no one asked for superman in Metropolis he decided Metropolis needed a Superman. The same Superman who claims he is not a judge, jury, or executioner Judge that Metropolis needed a hero. He is more not a man yet he wants us all to believe he is just that. In short he is a poser.

There is nothing wrong with liking Superman in fact there are times when Superman is probably for some, exactly what they need to read. He is the ultimate power fantasy. He could take over the world if he wants but he doesn't. He is the best way that some people feel they can redeem their hope in humanity because superman is the ideal. All I'm saying is that i find him to be super boring.

PS4 Reveal/Non Reveal

I saw the PS4 reveal which wasn't really a reveal. It was more of an acknowledgement. Nothing wrong with that but it wasn't a reveal. A reveal requires something to be you know....revealed, but that just schematics so let me get to the meat of this post. I liked what i saw but i wish i saw more. There seems to be a lot interesting features but i still a little wary i have to see it in action a live demo if you will before i can make any claim of how good it is

The Line In The Sand

So it has come to my attention that DC Comics has hired Orson Scott Card for their digital version of "Adventures of Superman" now i try not to get political on here because i feel everything is politicized today. I however won't mislead or make any false claims so before i go in on this topic i have to let you know before hand. I was raised by mother and my father who is also a girl. My mom is gay is what I'm saying. I have been around gay people all my life and i support their fight for equality. Now this post isn't about gay rights its about drawing your line. I've heard many of my friends says well "I won't be reading that issue" very loudly as to let me know they stand with me. That kind of irked me. Now don't get it twisted i have no intention of reading it myself but that is because I'm not a superman fan. Orson Scott Card had zero to do with why I'm not reading it. Many of my friend however feel that if they buy it they are betraying me or my mom for some reason. That if they buy this book they are supporting all of Orson Scott Cards beliefs. As some one is very active in gay rights let me be clear if you buy his books, it does not make you homophobe. It means you like his writing. You can appreciate something and not love the artist. As an American i love that Thomas Jefferson help draft the Constitution but does that mean i love slavery? No of course not because most adults can separate Thomas Jefferson the founding father and Thomas Jefferson the person. Just like most adults should be able to separate Orson Scott Card the writer and Orson Scott Card the man who dislike gays. Now don't get me wrong if you want to boycott DC because it personally crosses your line you are personally willing to tolerate or your principles that is fine. I know for some people that this is an extremely tough thing to do especially if you love superman but if your willing to do it that's fine. I personal think the battle of gay rights will be won on the ballot not the comic prints but that's just me. If you want to boycott go ahead but please don't tell somebody who is not boycotting that by buying that issue they are approving of Orson Scott Card message. It's wrong to guilt trip people to join your side. People want to read what interest them and it just so happens that a big homophobe is writing that story.

When Fun Is More Important Than Winning

You to play to win is a phrase heard a lot in sports. It is a simple phrase that sums up why you step out onto the court. It is the goal of every man or woman in competition. You want to win. It is generally one of the truer statements in life. I of course say generally because this is not always true. There are times when winning is simply a bonus after achieving your actual goal, which is having fun. To give you an example i had planned on playing Black Ops 2 with a buddy of mine but he unfortunately could not play so i was on my own. My first game i was with a group of dudes. Now they weren't a clan as far as i could tell but they were obviously friends who were in a party. I could hear one of them on the mic. His husky voice burst over the mic screaming "Pick Raid! Pick Raid!" (He must of had a lapse in judgement because everyone knows when you scream out a map everyone choose something else just to piss you off.) seeing that he map didn't get picked he let out a roar of disappointment "FUCK! YOU FAGGOTS SUCK!" i say How quaint into my mic. "Fuck You, You Fucking Bitch" he replies back to me. Clearly this man had a steroid sandwich for breakfast. while i am creating my class this guy starts talking strategy. Now i am not the most strategic gamer. My idea of strategy is throwing one flash bangs instead of two. so needless to say i was pretty lost on what he was talking it about.

The game start he was all ready barking orders go here, shoot there, set up a perimeter here. It felt like work. The game ends and he is handing out compliments he even told me good job but it didn't feel like it to me. I won yes but it was the same kind of empty winning that you get beating a 10 year old in basketball. now i had a good game i went 20-5 and i won so by all accounts i should be happy and having fun. I wasn't and it was because i played to win. Don't get me wrong it is not as if i don't try to win, but when i put my disc in my console my goal is to have fun. Winning can be fun it is not the antithesis of fun, but my main goal however is to have fun not to win. They often come together but not always. I have played games like Battle Field 3 or Black Ops 2 where my team won and i hated it I games where we lost and i loved it. My friend would eventually come on later and we would play about 15 games we lost about 12 of them. We did however reach our goal of having fun each and every game. Do you guys have any story about Winning not being fun?

Entitlement and Gamers

I was having a conversation with a friend of mine about online passes. After reading an article on Kotaku we discussed whether or not gamers feel entitled. He argued that many of us due in fact feel entitled to demand things out of our games. That we feel that we are owed something when we are not. I on the other hand argued that we don't feel entitled any more than any customer does. That we instead feel as if we have been cheated or mislead. The problem with gaming is that it works on a "Trust Me" narrative, so there are hardly demos any more and those that do exist are from games that have been out for 2 months or for buying on Live or PSN. Meaning that when we are told something buy a game and it doesn't match the experience we rage. One could argue that it is stupid to do so. I would disagree. Anytime you make an investment to buy a game you have earn the right to complain. Game feels too short? Go ahead and complain. level to difficult? Complain away. Game is to old school? Knock yourself out with complaints. Now your complaints might be stupid but you have paid for the right to complain (though if you do complain about these things often you might be know as what is called a whiner). DLC feels to some people as if they cut a piece of the game to sell you it back at a later date. Is this wrong? i don't know i'm sure not all games do that but does it feel like it? Absolutely! Due i feel like i am entitled to it? sometimes yeah. To me its like buying a pizza with seven slices at full price and then being told that you can buy the remaining slice for $5.

Besides that there is another thing that bothers me about this discussion. Entitlement has now become the go to word for any opinion that complains about a corporations actions. First off that shit is mad annoying, secondly it is only entitlement if i feel entitled. Pointing out online passes is stupid is not me being entitled. I don't think EA or Ubisoft owes me a free online pass. I just think the whole idea of online passes dumb. Third where are all of these corporation defenders coming from? A company can go out an kill somebody and their will be group of defenders claiming we aren't entitled to justice. Stop it. You just make everyone think your a dick. Anyway my point is that no we aren't entitled to anything from EA or Ubisoft this is true. We are however entitled to feel entitled so please for the love of all that is holy STFU about how gamers feel entitled. It serves no purpose other than to show me who not to hang out with at a party.